Sunday, June 19, 2011

18th Amendment: Maternity benefit law lapses

18th Amendment: Maternity benefit law lapses

Published: June 19, 2011

The law has yet be re-enacted as a provincial law.

FAISALABAD:

Under the 18th Amendment in the consultation, the 1958 West Pakistan Maternity Benefit Ordinance (WPMBO), which serves to protect the rights of working women, was repealed as a federal law and was to be re-enacted as a provincial law. Yet, till date the law has not been incorporated in any of the provincial governments – practically ceasing it from existence.

In fact, the maternity law is not being implemented in many organisations that employ women, especially in the industrial and commercial sectors.

While article 37 of the Constitution of Pakistan makes reference to maternity benefits for employed women, they are only provided to women employed in certain occupations.

The Maternity Benefit Ordinance 1958 stipulates that upon the completion of four months employment or qualifying period, a worker has the right of up to six weeks pre-natal and post-natal leave during which she is paid salary drawn on the basis of her last pay.

The ordinance is applicable to all industrial and commercial establishments in the country, excluding the tribal areas. It also places restrictions on the dismissal of women employees on maternity leave.

As per Section 3 of WPMBO, no employer shall knowingly employ a woman and no woman shall engage in employment in any [establishment] during the six weeks following the date she delivers a child.

Section 4 of the WPMBO provides right to and liability for payment of maternity benefits.

“Subject to the provisions of this Ordinance, every woman employed in an establishment shall be entitled to, and her employer shall be liable for, the payment of maternity benefit at the rate of her wages last paid during the period of six weeks immediately preceding and including the days on which she delivers the child and for each day of six weeks succeeding that day”.

Provincial legislators have yet to take up the issue of providing these benefits after the lapse of the federal law.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 19th, 2011.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

CPJ report: 2011 may also prove deadliest for journalists

CPJ report: 2011 may also prove deadliest for journalists

Published: June 15, 2011

Pakistan might be named the deadliest country for journalists for the second consecutive year

FAISALABAD:

With at least five journalists killed this year, Pakistan might be named the deadliest country for journalists for the second consecutive year, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).

“In 2010, with eight dead, Pakistan ranked as the most dangerous country for journalists and it looks like it may be again this year, with at least five killed,” said a statement issued on Monday night.

The CPJ called on Pakistani media organisations to review their security and journalist safety training procedures to address the mounting number of deaths of journalists in the country. “The government is unable to protect journalists from attacks. Therefore, media owners, managers, and journalists in the field must quickly unite and work hard on establishing and ensuring their security,” the statement said.

On Saturday, a twin blast in Peshawar killed 36 people including two Pakistani journalists. Five journalists were also injured in the blast.

The 2011 CPJ global impunity index “spotlights countries where journalists are slain and killers go scot-free”, with Pakistan ranking at number 10.

According to the CPJ 15 target killings of journalists have been recorded since the 2002 murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 15th, 2011.

Monday, June 13, 2011

Female Afghan journalist: 'I have no plans to stop

Female Afghan journalist: 'I have no plans to stop'

By Asieh Namdar, CNN
June 13, 2011 -- Updated 1331 GMT (2131 HKT)
Mina Habib says it's important for Afghans to be journalists so they can tell the stories of their own people.
Mina Habib says it's important for Afghans to be journalists so they can tell the stories of their own people.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Mina Habib is one of the few Afghan women journalists
  • She says she has been threatened before but continues her work
  • Her focus is children's issues; she says they're most important for the future of Afghanistan

(CNN) -- Mina Habib is doing what would have been unthinkable during the Taliban era. She is one of the few working female Afghan journalists.

For Habib, journalism is a passion, but it also helps support her family. Her father is unemployed, and her mother is partially paralyzed by a stroke.

From Kabul, Habib talked to CNN's Asieh Namdar about the challenges for women in Afghanistan and the inspiration, fears and risks associated with being a female journalist.

Q: Why did you want to be a journalist? Weren't you scared by the obvious risks?

A: I was aware of all the risks involved. Being a female journalist is not socially accepted. But I wanted to highlight the problems of women and children in Afghanistan. I felt I had a responsibility to tell their stories. I knew it would be a huge challenge and there would be many obstacles along the way, but I felt I had to do it, because my country needs Afghan journalists to tell the stories of their own people, to convey the problems that still exist.

Q: Were you inspired by anyone in particular? What are your favorite stories to cover?

A: It was my childhood dream to be a journalist, but no one [person] really inspired me. I like covering politics, exposing corruption and doing stories that involve children. My proudest story was exposing people who use sick children as beggars. A government commission banned the practice after my story.

Her story: A day's work in Afghanistan
Afghan women on the pitch and loving it
Female journalists under attack

Q: Were you ever threatened while covering these types of stories?

A: Yes. One of my reports had to do with child labor/child smuggling and children being used for suicide attacks. It was a story that had to be told. I came home that evening and found a letter on my door. I don't know who wrote it. It said my life would be in danger if continued my work as a journalist. I continued! I was also wounded last year while covering a suicide bombing in Kabul. My family blamed all this on my work. But I have no plans to stop.

Q: What's been the reaction, in your family and otherwise, to you wanting to be a journalist?

A: Like many Afghan families, they were totally against it. They wanted me to be a teacher or doctor. My family was worried about how I would be viewed and my safety. They thought it would be a tough job for a woman. They never supported me in this area.

Others are skeptical as well. They consider journalism "immoral work." I can hear them asking, "What is a girl doing outside the home, being a journalist?"

Q: How has life changed for you since the fall of the Taliban?

A: During the Taliban era, women could not work or get an education. They lived in fear. I'm working now, doing something I love. In Kabul, things are better, but in provinces, women are still afraid to work or study. Women can't appear in the media, work or study outside the home.

Q: How do you want to see yourself 10 years from now?

A: I want to be a successful and respected journalist -- to do my job, with freedom, without being threatened or harassed.

Q: What is your biggest fear today?

A: People standing in the way of me doing my work. Those who want to stop me from being a journalist. ... I blame cultural and social barriers that don't see women as equal to men. Even Islam says men and women are equal. But many still don't want to believe that. These are the same people who think it is inappropriate for women to even appear in public. I also blame government officials for not doing enough to ensure laws are balanced and fair for women.

Q: What do you do on your day off?

A: I live with my family, so I try to spend time with them. I help my mother and sisters. Sometimes, I bring my work home, writing my reports. My family gets upset. They want me to help with things around house more, instead of on my work.

Q: Do you think you yourself face greater dangers than international journalists who come to Afghanistan to report?

A: I think all journalists who are here to report the truth face danger.

Q: What do you want the world to know about you?

A: I want them to know that despite the obstacles before me, I will continue to work hard and be the best journalist I can be. I'm doing this for the children of Afghanistan because they are the future of this country.

Mina Habib writes for the daily Chiragh newspaper and the Institute for War & Peace Reporting. She received her journalism degree at Kabul University.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Where a story can cost you your life


Where a story can cost you your life
The recent murder of a journalist in Pakistan has sent chills through journalistic circles.
Last Modified: 11 Jun 2011

On Listening Post this week: Another journalist is murdered in Pakistan and the primary suspect is not an extremist group - it is the security forces. And sexism on Italian TV.

Pakistan is currently considered the most dangerous place on earth to report from. In just over a year, 16 journalists have been murdered. But the most recent case has sent a chill through journalistic circles there.

Syed Saleem Shahzad was an investigative journalist and the Pakistan bureau chief of Asia Times Online. When his body was discovered - bearing signs of torture - the chief suspect was not an extremist group but, according to other reporters, Pakistan's intelligence agency.

The media landscape in Pakistan is a pretty noisy, opinionated place but it often draws the line at the military and intelligence agencies - a line that Shahzad crossed. Our News Divide this week looks at the case of Syed Saleem Shahzad and the story that could have cost him his life.

In News Bytes this week: The curious case of an outspoken Syrian blogger who may, or may not have been arrested by the country's security forces; media freedom in Mexico continues to deteriorate as a newspaper's building is attacked and a missing journalist's body is discovered; Wikileaks frontman, Julian Assange receives the prestigious Martha Gelhorn prize for journalism; and the New York Times has a new executive editor, the first female in the paper's 160-year history to be given the role.

Media mogul and Italian prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi is about to go on trial for allegedly paying for sex with an under age prostitute. While this may be considered a sex scandal in Italy, what many Italians tend to overlook is just how sexually charged their television has become. Switch on the TV there today and you will be bombarded with images of women - whether they are dancing, reporting the weather or talking on chat shows - who are predominantly young, good-looking and scantily clad. Having attractive people on television is not a new phenomenon, but is it being taken too far in Italy? Listening Post's Meenakshi Ravi looks at the sexist representation of women in the Italian media, why that is and what is being done to change it.

Our Internet Video of the Week takes an addictive mobile phone video game and fuses it with a popular nursery rhyme, to make a rather insightful animation about the Arab uprisings. A lot of you will be familiar with the tale of the three little pigs, but for those of you who are not acquainted with the video game, it is called Angry Birds and the point is to demolish buildings (in this case regimes) by catapulting the birds into them. And if you look at the colour of these birds in particular, you will see the deliberate homage to another popular, addictive social media phenomenon - one that was instrumental in the uprisings. We hope you enjoy the show.

Listening Post can be seen each week at the following times GMT: Saturday: 0830, 1930; Sunday: 1430;Monday: 0430.


Slain journalists' families in Pakistan mourn for lifetime

CPJ Blog

Press Freedom News and Views

Slain journalists' families in Pakistan mourn for lifetime

It's a coincidence, but May 29, the date of Saleem Shahzad's kidnapping in Pakistan, coincides with the killing of journalist Munir Sangi six years ago. Against all odds, Sangi's widow, Yasmeen Sangi, is still fighting for justice in the case of her late husband, while Shahzad's widow, Anita Saleem--who is now responsible for the couple's three children--has decided not to appear publicly yet. Either way, fighting outright or suffering in silence, slain journalists' families pay a price that lasts a lifetime

Sangi worked for a leading regional Sindhi-language television channel, KTN. He was killed while covering a tribal feud in Larkana, home town of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Sangi's alleged killer were identified and arrested but, because of political connections, soon released.

It's too early to say how far Anita, her three children, her mother-in-law, and the rest of the extended family intend to fight for justice in Shahzad's case, but with Pakistan's premier intelligence agency (the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate) as the prime suspect in his death, you can be sure their battle will be far tougher than even that of Sangi's widow.

The widows are the ones who suffer most whether they contest the murder of their late husbands or not. Merunisa Khan, the widow oflate journalist Hayatullah Khan, who was kidnapped in December 2005 and killed in 2006, showed courage and identified the killers to Peshawar High Court Judge Mohammed Reza Khan, who investigated the death. Hayatullah Khan's younger brother was also killed in 2006, while his wife was killed in a bomb attack in 2007. The couple's four children have been dispersed among family members.

But those who survive the loss of their husbands still suffer too. "He went too early. My six children missed him almost every day," said Gulshan Ara, the widow of slain cameraman Arif Hussain, who worked for the television channel ARY, where I am now news director. The children too say they still miss their father. Arif was killed during a twin suicide blast on October 18, 2007, while covering the procession of former premier Benazir Bhutto in Karachi, in which 150 people were killed. Bhutto was to die two months later in another suicide blast in Rawalpindi.